KEYRUSKeyrus.com Redesign Plan
D-92 before release
01 · Ambition · Updated 2 September 2026

The website, our top marketing driver of business.

The keyrus.com redesign is not a cosmetic project: it's the marketing asset that generates the most pipeline. Every call in this plan serves three optimizations: UX (conversion), SEO (organic traffic) and GEO (visibility in generative AI answers, where the structured HOM narrative becomes a direct advantage).

UXJourneys & conversion, data first
SEOSemantic structure, offers × industries
GEOHOM narrative readable by AI engines
December 3general release
September 18approach validated, development starts
7 open decisions2 group-level · 5 website
10 people4 joining in September
02 · Where we stand

Architecture, templates and most of the content are already produced

This is the single most important fact in this plan. Jesse and Chanti have produced the menu architecture, the page templates and the bulk of the content; the Keyrus AI manifesto copy has been live on the dev instance since 6 July (43 entries, 508 fields, 7 languages). The 18 September gate is therefore a validation, not a production phase, which is what makes the December release reachable.

SurfaceWhat exists today
Menu architectureServices mega-menu grouping Services, Capabilities, Business Functions and Industries; Resources under Insights; “Keyplays” renamed Use Cases
Page templatesOne concept per page type, produced across the structure
HomepagenewHomepage published, manifesto copy in place
Services / Offers5 topServices and the new offer format
IndustriesInsurance pilot, complete and rich: approach, 6-step methodology, use cases, insights
About UsManifesto copy live in 7 languages
Content1,087 existing content items audited and mapped to the HOM layers

Dev instance: keyrus-redesign.netlify.app, connected to the development-3 Contentful environment. Remaining housekeeping on the instance (placeholder entries, duplicated key plays, the services title to reposition) is tracked outside this plan.

03 · What we need from the exec team

7 decisions still open, 4 already settled

Choices and comments are saved live in this browser, and the summary copies in one click for the write-up. Recommendations are proposals from the project team.

2Group-level, open
5Website, open
4Settled
11Total

Group-level decisions

Eric & Karen

These two outlive the redesign. They are brand and governance calls at group level, not website structure calls, and they change what the site has to support before templates are rolled out across every page.

Website decisions

Stephan & Christophe

Structure and content calls inside the project. Four of them have been settled by the work already done since July and are kept here for the record rather than reopened.

Summary copied
04 · Timeline

From validation on 18 September to release on 3 December

Proposed sequence, to be adjusted and signed off. Validation steps, then development, then the full delivery track: alpha, UAT, a beta phase with its own UAT layer, and a production rollout. Development is 15 working days, Monday 21 September to Friday 9 October. Scroll the chart horizontally on narrow screens.

1 · Menu architecture 2 · Page templates 3 · Content (SMEs) 4 · Design 5 · Development Buffer UAT Beta Rollout Exec checkpoint Shift workshop General release

Exec validation cadence

Run by Stephan and Christophe, roughly every two weeks. The Shift workshop in Paris is the one in-person gate, with all Shift leaders.

Validation process, in order

Click a step for its owner and validation loop.

05 · Team

Four people join the setup in September

On group marketing, on the content that is not industry specific, and on customer references. Industry experts are mobilised per industry once the template is validated.

Joining

Karen
Group marketing

Joins at group level; remit communicated shortly. Global versus local and the satellite sites are both group marketing calls.

Brahim & Christophe
Portfolio & HOM

Own the content that is not industry specific: the portfolio and the HOM, which is the global layer of decision D10.

Catherine
References

Customer success stories and references: the proof layer the positioning is missing.

Industry experts
To be named

One pairing per industry, mobilised once the industry template and wave 1 are confirmed (D3, D4).

In place

Baptiste
Lead UX & delivery

Drives the plan and the Contentful instance, follows the development track and challenges the technical choices.

Jesse Lopinski
Content & structure

Menu architecture, page templates, content matrices, and the audit of the 1,087 content items mapped to HOM.

Chanti
Design & UX

Design of the new surfaces, image direction, mockups, produced alongside the page structure rather than after it.

Erwan
Development

Build on the instance, test pass and production cutover.

Eric Cohen & Marc Stukkens
Top management

Briefed during the build, then the final go/no-go on 2 December before general release.

06 · The structuring approach

HOM becomes the backbone of the site

The corporate presentation V1 (June 2026) sets the narrative: Architect of intelligence, carried by the Human Orchestrated Model™. The site must reflect this architecture: HOM's 3 layers, the portfolio of 4 capabilities, and the taglines sprinkled across all pages. It's also the GEO lever: a proprietary, structured narrative is exactly what AI engines reproduce best.

The 3 layers of the Human Orchestrated Model™

Each layer is in production today, backed by hard numbers.
L3Performance Steering

Continuously steer decisions and execution toward measurable business impact. Proof: 12 % less spend on operations for a video giant.

L2Human in Command

Who decides, who governs, who's accountable: clear human oversight and pragmatic governance. Proof: 100 % ROI on a European bank's first GenAI programs, 20+ use cases.

L1Intelligence Foundations

Structure, activate and govern data and agents: the foundation for deploying AI at scale. Proof: $5M+ saved per harvest at an agribusiness producer.

Portfolio: 4 composable capabilities

The new offer breakdown per the corporate presentation.
Data FoundationsTrusted data, platforms, governance: the foundation.
AI & Agentic SystemsAgentic AI, advanced analytics, industrial-grade ML.
Decision & PerformanceFrom intelligence to decision, from decision to steerable performance.
Trust & GovernanceData & AI governance, compliance, sovereignty, cyber.
Delivery model: Advise · Implement · Operate, crossed with 5 business outcomes (Growth, Profitability, Decision Advantage, Risk & Transform, Adaptability).
We operationalize intelligence. Architect of intelligence AI does not transform businesses. Architected intelligence does. Don't optimize the present. Compound the future. Technology amplifies. Culture differentiates. We don't build AI tools. We operationalize intelligence. Integrating tools only scales agentic chaos. Data is the organization's genetic code. The Architecture of Hybrid Intelligence

The narrative's taglines, to highlight and sprinkle across the whole site (hero, sections, CTAs, offer pages).

Open thinking: making HOM demonstrable

The concern raised by the exec team: the positioning is a little too intellectual. HOM and “architect of intelligence” land at manifesto level, and the business directions need real examples to see themselves in it. Not decided, and not blocking the build.

Demonstrator
A demo page that assesses an AI opportunity

Start with Finance: translate concrete pains into HOM solutions with measurable outcomes. A website module and a sales asset at once.

Benchmark
Learn from niche players

They win on concreteness and a clear pain-to-solution story. Borrow that rather than stay at concept level.

Framework
An operating layer under the positioning

An AI operating system inside HOM: deploy and orchestrate agents with the human in command. Gives the abstract idea a demonstrable anchor.

Proof gap
Show “Human in Command”

L2 is the differentiator and the hardest to show. The audit below flags thin proof on agentic use cases and AI governance.

07 · The content audit · 19 Jun 2026

1,087 existing pieces of content, already mapped to HOM

The full portfolio audit (Jesse, June 2026): 553 blog insights, 434 key plays, 100 EPM pages. The 677 thematic content pieces spread across HOM's 3 layers in a balanced way (39 / 30 / 31 %): HOM isn't a narrative to fill in, it's a grid that structures editorial capital that's already there. The remaining 410 (136 industries, 85 events, 69 corporate, 19 client cases, 101 out of scope) cross-tag to a pillar or fall outside scope.

Mix by HOM layer 677 thematic content items

L1 · Intelligence Foundations262 · 39 %
L2 · Human in Command204 · 30 %
L3 · Performance Steering211 · 31 %
Insights (thought leadership) Key plays (proof) EPM
Reading: insights skew toward L1 + L2 (thinking through foundations and AI), key plays toward L3 (proving performance). Together, the portfolio covers all 3 layers.

The blind spots the grid reveals To fill

  • Semantic enablement & knowledge graphs : an official HOM capability, zero content. The portfolio's clearest white space.
  • Agentic & autonomous AI : 30 insights but 4 key plays. We talk about it without proving it: critical for an "Architect of intelligence" positioning.
  • AI governance, ethics & responsible AI : 8 pieces of content, no key play. The corporate portfolio's Trust & Governance pillar with no client proof.
  • Planning, FP&A & predictive models : 38 key plays but 5 insights. The reverse: proof without thought leadership, an EPM lane to activate.
LayerSub-themeInsightsKey playsTotal
L1Data platforms & cloud architecture8357140
L1Governance, trust & responsible data561775
L1Data products, monetisation & DataOps21930
L1Cybersecurity & resilience11517
L1Semantic enablement & knowledge graphs White space000
L2AI strategy, value & adoption592889
L2Generative AI, ML & LLM platforms241137
L2Talent, skills, AI literacy & change171636
L2Agentic & autonomous AI30434
L2AI governance, ethics & responsible AI808
L3Analytics, BI & dashboards334479
L3Planning, FP&A & predictive models53863
L3Performance, profitability & EPM103346
L3Decision intelligence & insight-to-action121023

This mapping changes the approach: HOM isn't landing on an empty site. Every surface (HOM, portfolio, industries, insights) can be linked from V1 to existing content tagged by layer, and the editorial calendar can be driven by the grid's gaps rather than ad hoc. That's decision D9.

08 · Workstreams & critical path

Who produces what, with which dependencies

The critical path runs through the 18 September validation: it releases development and the remaining content production. Most workstreams are already well advanced, so what follows is mostly finalisation and sign-off rather than production from scratch.

WorkstreamScope of workDependenciesOwnersMilestone
Menu architectureMega-menu grouping, Resources under Insights, Use Cases renamingProduced · D10 may move local contentJesse→ Sep 18
Page templatesOne template per page type, then rollout across all pagesProduced · Contact Us concept pendingJesse→ Sep 18
HomepageManifesto hero, HOM block, taglines, image selectionD1, D6 · copy already liveBaptiste · ChantiSep → Oct 8
Services / OffersNew offer format, naming against the 4 capabilitiesD2Jesse · BaptisteSep → Oct 8
HOMBuilding the HOM surface: content, design, links to offers and portfolioD1 · D10 for the global layerBrahim · Christophe · BaptisteSep → Oct 8
PortfolioCases rewritten in HOM format, duplicates removed, quantified proof per layer; priority on the audit's blind spotsD9, D10 · cases supplied by the practicesBrahim · Christophe→ Oct 8
ReferencesCustomer success stories, the proof layer for L2 Human in CommandClient approvalsCatherine→ Oct 8
IndustriesTemplate confirmed → wave 1 content → industry experts kick offD3, D4Jesse + industry expertsSep → Oct 8
About UsStructure reformat; the manifesto copy is already live in 7 languagesD5 settledBaptiste · Jesse→ Oct 8
UX & creativeExperience, image selection, validation via Shift: homepage, portfolio, HOM, menuD7 settled · Shift workshop 29 Sep → 1 OctChanti · Baptiste→ Sep 25
Contentful integrationHOM content model, taxonomy tags, placeholder cleanup, services title repositioningD9, D10 · all content validationsBaptiste · ErwanSep → Oct 8
DevelopmentWeb integration, QA, alpha, UAT, beta, production cutover, comms planSep 18 validationErwan · BaptisteSep 21 → Dec 3
15 working days to alpha
Sources: Contentful (development-3, verified via API on 6 Jul 2026) · Corporate presentation V1 (June 2026) · Content audit by Jesse Lopinski (1,107 records, 19 Jun 2026) · Feedback from Christophe Severs, September 2026 · Last update 2 September 2026 Dev instance: keyrus-redesign.netlify.app Internal Keyrus working document · not indexed